A human resources person is
interviewing a candidate for a job. The caption says “how has high school
prepared you for this job?” while the interviewee for the job is just seeing
tests.
I think that this makes a very good
statement; I understand where they are coming from. The argument is that
high school (and college) students are pushed too hard on testing. While this
is a valid point, I believe that there is not a better way to test the
students’ comprehension of any specific topic. In a perfect world, we
could all listen to our instructors and remember everything and absorb
everything. Sadly this is not a perfect world, so we must be tested on
how well we retain information. However, maybe students could be tested on
how they comprehend in other ways than testing. I personally have no clue
how such a thing could be tested, but that’s not my job to figure out.
The interviewee seems to be portrayed to be a nimrod, this enforces the
author’s point that high school graduates may be book smart, but overall they
are unprepared and essentially useless to the business world of the 21st
century. I don’t believe this is quite as blatant as the author makes it
out to seem. Most cartoons and cartoonists tend to overstate things to
get their point across more effectively. Although these students may be
prepared for each of their tests, which does not necessarily mean that they are
prepared for life as useful people in the business world.
So, who gets to decide what information goes on the test (and then, ultimately, what curriculum the teachers will teach to)?
ReplyDeletePerhaps some teachers could do an oral test, like they did in The Blind Side. That would make it seem more like a conversation than a test and some students might do better. Good job btw. :-)
ReplyDeleteI agree, I am a bad test taker sometimes and I hate it when teachers give such a broad topic or something like study for 8 chapters.
ReplyDelete